Daniels v. Colvin

Filing 11

ORDER - JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 5/12/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 6/11/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 6/26/2014. by Judge John L. Kane on 3/24/2014. (trlee, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. No. 13-cv-02460-AP
SAMANTHA DANIELS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN COLVIN,
ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Whitcompb, Esq.
Rocky Mountain Disability Law Group
1391 Speer Boulevard, Suite 705
Denver, Colorado 80204
303-534-1954
303-534-1949 (facsimile)
[e-mail]
For Defendant:
Christina J. Valerio
Assistant Regional Counsel
Social Security Administration
Office of General Counsel
Region VIII
1961 Stout, Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

2.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
-1-

3.

DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.

B.

Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: February 27, 2013

C.
4.

Date Complaint Was Filed:

September 10, 2013

Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: March 4, 2014

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

To the best of her knowledge, Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate.
To the best of her knowledge, Defendant states that the record is complete and accurate.
5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.

6.

STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES

The parties state that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses.
7.

OTHER MATTERS

The parties state that there are no other matters.
8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

The parties agreed to the following schedule:
A.

May 12, 2014

B.

Defendant’s Response Brief Due:

June 11, 2014

C.

9.

Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due:

Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due:

June 26, 2014

STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.

Plaintiff’s Statement:

Plaintiff does not request oral argument.

B.

Defendant’s Statement:

Defendant does not request oral argument.
-2-

10.

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A.

B.

11.

( )

(X )

All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.

AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF
RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing
of good cause.
DATED this 24thday of March, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
JOHN F. WALSH
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

APPROVED:

J. BENEDICT GARCÍA
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
/s/ Joseph A. Whitcomb
By: Joseph A. Whitcomb
Rocky Mountain Disability Law Group
1391 Speer Blvd., Suite 705
Denver, CO 80204
303-534-1954
[e-mail]

/s/ Christina J. Valerio
By: Christina J. Valerio
Assistant Regional Counsel
Social Security Administration
Office of General Counsel
Region VIII
1961 Stout, Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
-3-