Hatlee et al v. Hardey et al
Filing
143
ORDER dimissing as moot 125 Motion for Extension of Time to File and 137 Motion to Strike. Claims and causes of action asserted against Defendants Cindy Hardey, Bobbi Priestly, Monte Gore, and Fred Wegener in their individual and official capac ities are dismissed with prejudice. Each party to pay their own costs and fees. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant Ashley Olds pursuant to the 110 Order entered on 9/29/2015. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 2/11/2016. (cpear)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Raymond P. Moore
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02469-RM-MJW
RANDALL J. HATLEE and
RONALD L. SWIFT,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CINDY HARDEY,
BOBBI PRIESTLY,
MONTE GORE,
FRED WEGENER, and
ASHLEIGH OLDS,
Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court sua sponte in connection with the Plaintiffs’ filing of the
Stipulation of Dismissal of All Claims against the Park County Defendants (ECF No. 141, the
“Stipulation of Dismissal”). The Stipulation of Dismissal purports to stipulate to the dismissal,
with prejudice, of all remaining claims in this action against Defendants Cindy Hardey, Bobbi
Priestly, Monte Gore, and Fred Wegener in their individual and official capacities. (Id.) The
Court also notes that its previous Order of September 29, 2015 dismissed all claims then pending
against Defendant Ashely Olds. (ECF No. 110.)
The Stipulation of Dismissal does not suffice to operate, in and of itself, as a dismissal of
all claims in this matter. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (permitting voluntary dismissal
without a court order by the filing of a stipulation of dismissal only if signed by all parties who
have appeared). However, in light of the parties’ agreement as evidenced by that document, the
Court will treat the Stipulation of Dismissal as an unopposed motion to dismiss, which the Court
hereby GRANTS.
Based on the foregoing, the Court ORDERS:
1. The claims and causes of action asserted by Plaintiffs against Defendants Cindy
Hardey, Bobbi Priestly, Monte Gore, and Fred Wegener in their individual and official capacities
are in all respects DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party shall pay their own costs and fees with
respect to these Defendants and the claims asserted against these Defendants.
2. Defendants’ Motion for a One-Day Extension of Time to File a Motion in Limine (ECF
No. 125) is DISMISSED as moot.
3. Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Expert Witness Dr. Jena Questen Pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B) And to Preclude Expert Testimony Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 702 (ECF
No. 137) is DISMISSED as moot.
4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant Ashley
Olds and against Plaintiffs pursuant to the Court’s Order of September 29, 2015. (See ECF No.
110.)
DATED this 11th day of February, 2016.
BY THE COURT:
____________________________________
RAYMOND P. MOORE
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?