Woodgate Commons Homeowners Association v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company

Filing 8

ORDER Remanding Case. By Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 10/1/2013. (klyon, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger Civil Action No. 13-cv-02488-MSK WOODGATE COMMONS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ORDER REMANDING CASE THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte. The Plaintiff commenced this action in the Arapahoe County District Court. Plaintiff’s Complaint asserts three claims for relief: (1) Insurance Bad Faith; (2) Breach of Contract; and (3) Statutory Bad Faith. In its Complaint, the Plaintiff did not request any particular monetary relief. In the Notice of Removal, the Defendant asserts that this Court can exercise jurisdiction based upon diversity pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1332. The Defendant relies primarily upon the Plaintiff’s election on the mandatory Colorado Civil Cover Sheet stating: “This party is seeking a monetary judgment for more than $100,000 against another party, including any attorney fees, penalties or punitive damages, but excluding interest and costs[.]” In accordance with the analysis set forth in Baker v. Sears Holding Corp., 557 F. Supp. 2d 1208 (D. Colo. 2007), there has been an insufficient showing of the requisite amount in controversy to establish diversity jurisdiction. Accordingly, the action must be remanded to the State Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is REMANDED to the Arapahoe County District Court. Dated this 1st day of October, 2013. BY THE COURT: Marcia S. Krieger Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?