Dahn v. Adoption Alliance et al

Filing 192

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 187 Joint Motion to Refer Case to U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty for Settlement Conference Only by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 11/13/14. (dkals, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Raymond P. Moore Civil Action No. 13-cv-02504-RM-CBS JAMES DAHN, Plaintiff, v. ADOPTION ALLIANCE, MELANIE TEM, individually and in her official capacity; VICKI LITTLE, individually and in her official capacity; AUDREY AMEDEI, individually and in her official capacity; and AMANDA CRAMER, individually and in her official capacity; Defendants. ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Joint Motion to Refer Case to U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty for Settlement Conference Only (ECF No. 187) (the “Motion”). The Motion is granted in part and denied in part. It is granted to the extent that a settlement conference will be held in this case but denied as to the request for referral to U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. The settlement conference will occur before U.S. Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer, who is currently assigned to this case. The Court appreciates the parties’ concern with respect to the fact that Judge Shaffer has issued a recommendation on a dispositive matter in this case. Nonetheless, the Court directs that the settlement conference occur before the judge to whom this case is assigned. Wherefore, it is ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Refer Case to U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty for Settlement Conference Only (ECF No. 187) is granted in part and denied in part. Magistrate Judge Shaffer is authorized to conduct a settlement conference in this case. Parties are directed to contact Judge Shaffer’s Chambers to arrange a date and time for the conference. DATED this 13th day of November, 2014. BY THE COURT: ____________________________________ RAYMOND P. MOORE United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?