Jacobs et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

Filing 20

ORDER denying as moot 8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond ; denying as moot 10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond ; denying as moot 13 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; denying without prejudice 14 Motion to Dismiss; denying without prejudice 16 Motion to Dismiss. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/10/13.(bnbcd, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02518-REB-BNB
DEAN L. JACOBS, and
MARCIELLE S. JACOBS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,
OCWEN MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC.,
OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION,
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION,
WAYNE E. VADEN, in his official capacity as managing partner of the Vaden Law Firm, LLC,
WAYNE E. VADEN, in his individual capacity,
ROBERT LILJANDER, KELLER WILLIAMS REALTY, INC., in his official capacity,
ROBERT LILJANDER, in his individual capacity,
RICHARD E. PETTITT, in his official capacity, as Elbert County Public Trustee,
LAWRENCE E. CASTLE, in his official capacity, as managing partner of CASTLE LAW
GROUP, LLC, f/k/a Castle Stawiarski, LLC,
LAWRENCE E. CASTLE, in his individual capacity,
YVONNE G. SMITH, in her individual capacity,
GORDON D. SMITH, in his individual capacity,
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGITRATION SYSTEM (‘MERS”),
MERSCORP HOLDINGS, INC., parent company of MERS, and
DOES 1-1000,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
By separate order, I struck the plaintiffs’ Complaint and ordered the plaintiffs to file an
amended complaint [Doc. #18]. In the meantime, however, the defendants filed motions to
extend time to respond and motions to dismiss addressed to the now-stricken Complaint.
IT IS ORDERED:

(1) The Ocwen Defendants’ Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs’
Verified Complaint [Doc. #8, filed 10/03/2013] is DENIED AS MOOT;
(2) The Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint
on Behalf of Defendants Robert Liljander and Keller Williams Realty, Inc. [Doc. #10, filed
10/04/2013] is DENIED AS MOOT;
(3) The Motion for Leave to File Motion in Excess of the Standard Page Limits
Pursuant to REB Civ. Practice Standard IV.B.1 [Doc. #13, filed 10/08/2013] is DENIED AS
MOOT;
(4) Defendant Castle Law Group, LLC & Lawrence E. Castle’s Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiffs’ Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) [Doc. #14, filed
10/08/2013] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
(5) The Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Yvonne Smith and Gordon Smith [Doc.
#16, filed 10/08/2013] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Dated October 10, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge

2