Eddins et al v. Time Warner NY Cable, LLC

Filing 74

ORDER withdrawing 72 Order on Motion to Dismiss Party. Denying as moot 71 Unopposed MOTION to Dismiss Party filed by Dena M. Cannon, Juliana Van Tuil, Stephanie S.A. Eddins, Jerry W. Eddins, Suzanne Bolden, by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 2/7/2014. (trlee, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Raymond P. Moore Civil Action No. 13BcvB02521BRMBMJW JERRY W. EDDINS, DENA M CANNON, STEPHANIE S. A. EDDINS, JULIANA VAN TUIL, and SUZANNE BOLDEN, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. TIME WARNER NY CABLE LLC, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER __________________________________________________________________________ THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs Jerry W. Eddins and Stephanie S. A. Eddins’ (collectively, the “Eddins”) Amended Motion to Dismiss Named Plaintiffs (“Amended Motion”) (ECF No. 73) filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2). Upon consideration of the Amended Motion, and Defendant’s objection to the Eddins’ request that they be permitted to opt in at a later time, the Court’s Order entered February 6, 2014 (ECF No. 72) is hereby WITHDRAWN. It is also ORDERED that the Eddins’ Motion to Dismiss Named Plaintiffs (ECF No. 71) is denied as moot; and FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall file any response to the Amended Motion, limited to ten pages excluding the certificate of service, by Friday, February 14, 2014. DATED this 7th day of February, 2014. BY THE COURT: ____________________________________ RAYMOND P. MOORE United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?