Simmons v. Hinton et al

Filing 70

MINUTE ORDER denying 67 Motion to Stay Final Pre-Trial DeadlinesPending Courts Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 2/27/2015.(slibi, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-02566-CMA-MJW TRAVIS J. SIMMONS, Plaintiff(s), v. BRYCE HINTON, Individually, SCOTT BIRD, Individually, and LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF RODNEY FENSKE, in his Official Capacity and Individually, Defendant(s). MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Stay Final Pre-Trial Deadlines Pending Court’s Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 67) is DENIED for the following reasons. On September 3, 2014, this court entered a Final Pretrial Order (docket no. 60). All discovery was completed as of September 3, 2014. See paragraph 8. DISCOVERY in the Final Pretrial Order (docket no. 60). This court was well aware of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 46), filed June 23, 2014, at the Final Pretrial Conference on September 3, 2014. Plaintiff responded to such motion (docket no. 46) on July 17, 2014 (docket no. 51), and Defendants replied on August 4, 2014 (docket no. 55). This motion (docket no. 46) is pending before District Judge Arguello and has been ripe for ruling since August 4, 2014. A Trial Preparation Conference is set before District Judge Arguello on March 18, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. See docket no. 65. A five-day Jury Trial is set before District Judge Arguello on March 30, 2015, at 8:00 a.m. with Jury Selection to begin on March 23, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. See docket no. 59. Based upon the current posture of this case, this court finds no basis to stay the Final Pre-Trial Deadlines. Accordingly, the subject motion (docket no. 67) should be denied. Date: February 27, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?