Simmons v. Hinton et al

Filing 99

FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Bryce Hinton and Scott Bird and against Travis J. Simmons pursuant to 91 Jury Trial, by Clerk on 4/6/2015. (ebuch)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Case No. 13-cv-02566-CMA-MJW TRAVIS J. SIMMONS, Plaintiff, v. BRYCE HINTON, Individually, and SCOTT BIRD, Individually, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered. Commencing on March 30, 2015, this action was tried before a jury of eight duly sworn to try the issues herein with U.S. District Judge Christine M. Arguello presiding. On April 3, 2015, the jury rendered its verdict, finding that: (1) Plaintiff Simmons did not prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, his claims of excessive force, battery, and extreme and outrageous conduct against Defendant Bryce Hinton. (2) Plaintiff Simmons did not prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, his claims of excessive force, battery, and extreme and outrageous conduct against Defendant Scott Bird. Final judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants, Bryce Hinton and Scott Bird and against Plaintiff, Travis J. Simmons. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants, Bryce Hinton and Scott Bird shall have their costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. It is FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint and this civil action are DISMISSED with prejudice. DATED at Denver, Colorado this 6th day of April, 2015. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/Emily Buchanan Emily Buchanan, Deputy Clerk APPROVED BY THE COURT: ________________________________ United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?