Canales et al v. AMPCO System Parking, Inc. et al

Filing 68

ORDER denying 63 Motion to suppress and granting 67 Motion for Leave to Restrict. It is therefore ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to maintain Exhibits B, I, K, N, P, Q, T, U, V, GG, HH, II, JJ and KK 65 under a Level 1 restricted access. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 1/29/2015.(tscha, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Raymond P. Moore
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02571-RM-MJW
ANNETTE CANALES,
VICTOR BARRERA,
Plaintiffs,
v.
AMPCO System Parking a/k/a ABM Parking Services, Inc.,
Defendant.
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter is before the Court on the unopposed Motion to Restrict Public Access to
Confidential Summary Judgment Exhibits (“Motion”) (ECF No. 67) filed by Defendant AMPCO.
This Motion supplants Defendant’s earlier Motion to Restrict (ECF No. 63) filed erroneously as a
“Motion to Suppress.” As such, the earlier filed “Motion to Suppress” (ECF No. 63) is DENIED
as moot.
This Court, having reviewed the Motion and the file herein, and finding compliance with
the requirements of D.C.COLOLCivR 7.2, hereby GRANTS the Motion (ECF No. 67). In
addition, although submitted as a restricted document but not specifically referenced in the
Motion, the Court finds that Exhibit KK also contains private and confidential information,
including information protected under Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2. It is therefore ORDERED that the
Clerk of Court is directed to maintain Exhibits B, I, K, N, P, Q, T, U, V, GG, HH, II, JJ and KK

(ECF No. 65) to Defendant AMPCO’s Motion for Summary Judgment under a Level 1 restricted
access.
DATED this 29th day of January, 2015.
BY THE COURT:

____________________________________
RAYMOND P. MOORE
United States District Judge

2