Chafin v. Stasi et al

Filing 118

FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to the 117 ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS of Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel entered on March 31, 2015 it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff DANIELE CHAFIN recovers nothing, the action is dismissed on the merits, and Defendant NICHOLAS STASI; KELLI JAYCOX; MICHAEL KELLY, and THE CITY OF DURANGO is AWARDED their costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1., by Clerk on 3/31/2015. (evana, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-02661-WYD-MEH DANIELE CHAFIN, Plaintiff, v. NICHOLAS STASI; KELLI JAYCOX; MICHAEL KELLY, AND THE CITY OF DURANGO, Defendant. FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered. Pursuant to the ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS of Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel entered on March 31, 2015 it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff DANIELE CHAFIN recovers nothing, the action is dismissed on the merits, and Defendant NICHOLAS STASI; KELLI JAYCOX; MICHAEL KELLY, and THE CITY OF DURANGO is AWARDED their costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. Dated at Denver, Colorado this 31st day of March, 2015. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/ Robert R. Keech Robert R. Keech Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?