Johnson v. Santini et al

Filing 67

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/21/14 re: Motion for Joinder of Claims and Joinder of Parties 62 . The Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of the court's prisoner complaint form to the plaintiff. (bsimm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 13-cv-02664-REB-BNB JOSHUA C. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE SANTINI, ALICIA VINYARD, T. K. COZZA RHODES, and PETER BLUDWORTH, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on the plaintiff’s Motion for Joinder of Claims and Joinder of Parties [Doc. #62, filed 11/17/2014]. The plaintiff seeks to file a supplement to his Amended Complaint which adds allegations and defendants. The plaintiff may not amend his Amended Complaint by simply filing piecemeal amendments and supplements. Rather, he must file the entire proposed amended complaint on the court’s prisoner complaint form. The plaintiff may not incorporate by reference his original or Amended Complaint into the proposed second amended complaint. The second amended complaint must stand alone; it must contain all of the plaintiff’s claims. Mink v. Suthers, 482 F.3d 1244, 1254 (10th Cir. 2007) (stating that “an amended complaint supercedes an original complaint and renders the original complaint without legal effect”) (internal quotations and citations omitted). IT IS ORDERED: (1) The plaintiff’s Motion for Joinder of Claims and Joinder of Parties [Doc. #62] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and (2) The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of the court’s prisoner complaint form to the plaintiff. Dated November 21, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?