Anaya v. Colvin

Filing 10

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 6/12/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 6/11/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 6/26/2014 by Judge John L. Kane on 04/01/14. (jhawk, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-2714-AP
Plaintiff,
Emilio Anaya,
v.
Carolyn Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASE

1.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Kenneth Scott, #24403
Scott Law Offices, P.C.
3801 E. Florida Ave., Suite 400
Denver, CO 80210
[phone]
[e-mail]
For Defendant:
James Burgess
Office of the General Counsel
1961 Stout St., Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294
[phone]
[e-mail]

2.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3.

DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.

Date Complaint Was Filed: October 3, 2013

B.

Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: January 22, 2014
-1-

C.
4.

Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: March 11, 2013

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
The parties believe the record to be adequate at this time.

5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
At this time, neither party anticipates the submission of additional evidence.

6.

STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES
The parties agree that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses.

7.

OTHER MATTERS
This case is not an appeal of a previously remanded case, and there are no other matters
to be brought to the attention of the Court.

8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.
B.

Defendant’s Response Brief Due: June 11, 2014

C.
9.

Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: May 12, 2014

Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: June 26, 2014

STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
The parties do not request oral argument.

10.

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
B.

11.

( x ) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.

AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS
OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.
-2-

DATED this 1st day of April, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVED:

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

s/Kenneth Scott
Attorney for Plaintiff
3801 E. Florida Ave., Suite 400
Denver, CO 80210
[phone]
[e-mail]

s/James Burgess
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Office of General Counsel
1961 Stout St., Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294
[phone]
[e-mail]

-3-