Resley v. Colvin
Filing
17
ORDER for sentence 6 remand, by Judge John L. Kane on 3/13/2014. (trlee, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge John L. Kane
Civil Action No. 13-cv-2746-AP
TODD RESLEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
ORDER FOR SENTENCE 6 REMAND
Kane, J.
This social security appeal is before me on Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand
(Doc. 13). Plaintiff seeks a remand so the ALJ may consider a corrected version
of his treating physician’s affidavit regarding visual limitations suffered a result of
an orbit fracture of his face. Specifically, the physician has indicated that the
statement in her original affidavit that Plaintiff would “constantly” be able to use
his depth perception and field of vision in a work setting was “an error,” and that
what she intended to say was that Plaintiff would be able to use his depth
perception and fields of vision in a work setting only “rarely.”
Plaintiff initially characterized the relief requested as a motion for remand
under “sentence 4" of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), but agreed after considering the
government’s arguments in response that any pre-merits remand of this matter
would have to be under sentence 6. I agree, and rule that consistent with Rule 1
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the just, speedy, and most efficient
means of addressing the matter is to grant the remand requested over the
government’s objection. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for a sentence 6 Remand is
GRANTED. This matter is REMANDED to the ALJ for consideration of Dr.
Kruger’s corrected affidavit.
Dated March 13, 2014.
s/John L. Kane
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?