Wanstallv. Armijo et al.

Filing 61

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/9/14. Defendants' Motion for Protective Order 38 is GRANTED. A blanket protective order will enter separately. The BOP Motion for Protective Order 52 is GRANTED. The Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of the Federal Bureau of Prisons shall occur on July 25, 2014, at a time and place as the parties may agree. (bsimm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 13-cv-02789-PAB-BNB RALEN SHANE WANSTALL, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH ARMIJO, Correctional Officer, United States Penitentiary-Florence, in his individual capacity, JEFFREY KAMMRAD, Senior Officer, United States Penitentiary-Florence, in his individual capacity, CHARLES DANIELS, Warden, United States Penitentiary-Florence, in his individual capacity, and JANE/JOHN DOE, Associate Warden, United State Penitentiary-Florence, in his or her individual capacity, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on the following: (1) Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order [Doc. # 38, filed 6/5/204]; and (2) Motion for Protective Order By Nonparty Federal Bureau of Prisons [Doc. # 52, filed 6/26/2014] (the “BOP Motion for Protective Order”). I held a hearing on the motions this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. IT IS ORDERED: (1) Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order [Doc. # 38] is GRANTED. A blanket protective order will enter separately. (2) The BOP Motion for Protective Order [Doc. # 52] is GRANTED. The Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of the Federal Bureau of Prisons shall occur on July 25, 2014, at a time and place as the parties may agree. The deposition shall not exceed one day of seven hours. Dated July 9, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?