Brooks v. Colvin

Filing 13

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (ORDER). SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 3/18/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 4/17/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 5/2/2014. By Judge John L. Kane on 2/5/2014. (klyon, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02812-AP
R. M. BROOKS, o/b/o N.N.F.,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Rachael A. Lundy
402 W. 12th Street
Pueblo, CO 81003
719-543-8636
719-543-8403 (facsimile)
[e-mail]
For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
J. Benedict García
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
[e-mail]
David I. Blower
DAVID I. BLOWER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294-4003
303-844-1571
303-844-0770 (facsimile)
[e-mail]
1

2.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3).
3.

DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.

Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: November 21, 2013

C.

4.

Date Complaint Was Filed: October 15, 2013

Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: January 17, 2014

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

To the best of his knowledge, Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate.
To the best of her knowledge, Defendant states that the record is complete and accurate.

5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.

6.

STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES

The parties state that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses.

7.

OTHER MATTERS

This case is not an appeal from a decision issued on remand. The parties have no other matters to bring to
the attention of the Court.
8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.

Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due:

March 18, 2014

B.

Defendant’s Response Brief Due:

April 17, 2014

C.

Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due:

May 2, 2014

2

9.

STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.
B.

10.

Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A.

B.

11.

(

)

(X)

All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.

AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF
RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing
of good cause.
DATED this 5th day of February, 2014.
BY THE COURT:

s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

3

APPROVED:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
s/ Rachael A. Lundy
402 W. 12th Street
Pueblo, CO 81003
719-543-8636
719-543-8403 (facsimile)
[e-mail]

By: s/ David I. Blower
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
1961 Stout St., Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294-4003
303-844-1571
303-844-0770 (facsimile)
[e-mail]

Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorneys for Defendant

4