Brooks v. Colvin

Filing 13

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (ORDER). SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 3/18/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 4/17/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 5/2/2014. By Judge John L. Kane on 2/5/2014. (klyon, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-02812-AP R. M. BROOKS, o/b/o N.N.F., Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: Rachael A. Lundy 402 W. 12th Street Pueblo, CO 81003 719-543-8636 719-543-8403 (facsimile) seckarlaw@mindspring.com For Defendant: John F. Walsh United States Attorney J. Benedict García Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney’s Office J.B.Garcia@usdoj.gov David I. Blower DAVID I. BLOWER Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169 Denver, CO 80294-4003 303-844-1571 303-844-0770 (facsimile) David.blower@ssa.gov 1 2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3). 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: November 21, 2013 C. 4. Date Complaint Was Filed: October 15, 2013 Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: January 17, 2014 STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD To the best of his knowledge, Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate. To the best of her knowledge, Defendant states that the record is complete and accurate. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES The parties state that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses. 7. OTHER MATTERS This case is not an appeal from a decision issued on remand. The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court. 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: March 18, 2014 B. Defendant’s Response Brief Due: April 17, 2014 C. Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: May 2, 2014 2 9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. B. 10. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE Indicate below the parties' consent choice. A. B. 11. ( ) (X) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED this 5th day of February, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/John L. Kane U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 3 APPROVED: UNITED STATES ATTORNEY John F. Walsh United States Attorney s/ Rachael A. Lundy 402 W. 12th Street Pueblo, CO 81003 719-543-8636 719-543-8403 (facsimile) seckarlaw@mindspring.com By: s/ David I. Blower Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 1961 Stout St., Suite 4169 Denver, CO 80294-4003 303-844-1571 303-844-0770 (facsimile) david.blower@ssa.gov Attorney for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?