Quinn et al v. Mulvihill et al
Filing
45
COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held on 3/5/2015 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint Pursuant to the Court's Order Granting Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 30] 33 is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. Separate order to issue. FTR: Courtroom C-205. (bsimm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE NINA Y. WANG
Civil Action: 13-cv-02818-CMA-NYW
Courtroom Deputy: Brandy Simmons
Parties
Date: March 5, 2015
FTR: NYW COURTROOM C-205
Counsel
ROBERT QUINN,
KAREN QUINN,
PATRICIA RODENZ,
MICHAEL MCCLENDON,
DAVID AKSLAND,
SEAN MULVIHILL,
STEPHEN MULVIHILL,
EDWIN BAKER,
VIRGINIA BAKER,
STAN LYNN,
EDWARD LOVELACE,
DONNA LOVELACE,
EJL ENTERPRISES, INC.,
PRARIE LAND, LLC,
CRAIG CLAUSEN,
KENLOU, LLC,
GARY LEVIN,
FIDDLEBACK RANCH, LLC,
WILLIAM PAUL SUMMERS,
EUGENE ERICKSON,
ANNE ERICKSON,
LORA KRISTA,
REBECCA ARNOLD,
DENNIS LEONARD,
THOMAS MARONEY,
STATION GULCH RANCH, LLC,
RICHARD O’LEARY,
LINDA O’LEARY,
MORNINGSTAR DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
AMANDA PINES, LLC,
AMANDA PINES NORTH, LLC,
LADERO LAND DEVELOPMENT INC.,
James David Thorburn
Plaintiffs,
* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119.
v.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
ELBERT COUNTY,
Josh Adam Marks
Defendant.
COURTROOM MINUTES
MOTION HEARING
Court in session: 10:59 a.m.
Appearances of counsel.
Argument held on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Complaint Pursuant to the Court’s Order
Granting Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 30] [33] filed on October 31, 2014.
For the reasons stated on the record, it is
ORDERED: Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Complaint Pursuant to the Court’s Order
Granting Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 30] [33] is TAKEN UNDER
ADVISEMENT. Separate order to issue.
Court in recess: 11:38 a.m. Hearing concluded.
Total time in court: 00:39
* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?