Quinn et al v. Mulvihill et al

Filing 45

COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held on 3/5/2015 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint Pursuant to the Court's Order Granting Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 30] 33 is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. Separate order to issue. FTR: Courtroom C-205. (bsimm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO MAGISTRATE JUDGE NINA Y. WANG Civil Action: 13-cv-02818-CMA-NYW Courtroom Deputy: Brandy Simmons Parties Date: March 5, 2015 FTR: NYW COURTROOM C-205 Counsel ROBERT QUINN, KAREN QUINN, PATRICIA RODENZ, MICHAEL MCCLENDON, DAVID AKSLAND, SEAN MULVIHILL, STEPHEN MULVIHILL, EDWIN BAKER, VIRGINIA BAKER, STAN LYNN, EDWARD LOVELACE, DONNA LOVELACE, EJL ENTERPRISES, INC., PRARIE LAND, LLC, CRAIG CLAUSEN, KENLOU, LLC, GARY LEVIN, FIDDLEBACK RANCH, LLC, WILLIAM PAUL SUMMERS, EUGENE ERICKSON, ANNE ERICKSON, LORA KRISTA, REBECCA ARNOLD, DENNIS LEONARD, THOMAS MARONEY, STATION GULCH RANCH, LLC, RICHARD O’LEARY, LINDA O’LEARY, MORNINGSTAR DEVELOPMENT, LLC, AMANDA PINES, LLC, AMANDA PINES NORTH, LLC, LADERO LAND DEVELOPMENT INC., James David Thorburn Plaintiffs, * To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119. v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ELBERT COUNTY, Josh Adam Marks Defendant. COURTROOM MINUTES MOTION HEARING Court in session: 10:59 a.m. Appearances of counsel. Argument held on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Complaint Pursuant to the Court’s Order Granting Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 30] [33] filed on October 31, 2014. For the reasons stated on the record, it is ORDERED: Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Complaint Pursuant to the Court’s Order Granting Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 30] [33] is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. Separate order to issue. Court in recess: 11:38 a.m. Hearing concluded. Total time in court: 00:39 * To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?