Salemi v. Colorado Public Employees' Retirement Association et al

Filing 96

ORDER On Motions to Restrict Public Access. it is ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to Supplement ECF No. 93 is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Restrict Access ECF No. 83 is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant s Motion to Restrict Access ECF No. 76 is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the entirety of Plaintiffs Response ECF No. 69 is hereby RESTRICTED at Level 1, with leave granted to Plaintiff to file a redacted version of her Response, with redactions made at Fact Paragraphs 38, 41, 43, and 214, as well as page 73 at footnote 12, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 1/13/2016.(evana, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel Civil Action No. 13-cv-2826-WYD-CBS ELHAM SALEMI, Plaintiff, v. COLORADO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION; TIM MOORE, in his official and individual capacities; ANGELA SETTER, in her official and individual capacities; Defendants. ___________________________________________________________________ ORDER ON MOTIONS TO RESTRICT PUBLIC ACCESS __________________________________________________________________ THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Restrict Public Access to Exhibits to and Portions of Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 76), filed on August 24, 2015; Defendants’ Motion to Restrict Public Access to Exhibits to and Portions of Reply in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 83), filed on August 31, 2015; and Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Supplement Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Restrict Public Access to Exhibits in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 93), filed on October 5, 2015. After careful consideration of the record, and the requirements for motions seeking to restrict access to documents under D.C.COLO.L.CivR 7.2, it is ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to Supplement (ECF No. 93) is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Restrict Access (ECF No. 83) is GRANTED. Exhibits 52 and 57, attached to Defendants’ Reply to its Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 81), are RESTRICTED at Level 1, which limits access to the parties and this Court. Fact Paragraphs 36(b) (the chart), 38, 214, and page 66 of Defendants’ Reply to its Motion for Summary Judgment have already been redacted by the Defendant, and shall stand as filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Restrict Access (ECF No. 76) is GRANTED. Exhibits 4, 6, 9, 11, 14, 15, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 48, 49, and 50 of Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Plaintiff’s Response is at ECF No. 69; the Exhibits in question are attached at ECF No. 70), are RESTRICTED at Level 1, which limits access to the parties and this Court. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the entirety of Plaintiff’s Response (ECF No. 69) is hereby RESTRICTED at Level 1, with leave granted to Plaintiff to file a redacted version of her Response, with redactions made at Fact Paragraphs 38, 41, 43, and 214, as well as page 73 at footnote 12. Dated: January 13, 2016 BY THE COURT: s/ Wiley Y. Daniel Wiley Y. Daniel Senior United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?