Calhoun v. Colvin

Filing 33

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 6/9/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 7/9/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 7/24/2014 by Judge John L. Kane on 04/29/14. (jhawk, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-2837-AP
Ronald Clarence Calhoun,
Plaintiff,
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
Pro se Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Calhoun
P.O. Box 44211
Denver, CO 80201-4421
720-975-3303
For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
J. Benedict García
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
[e-mail]
David I. Blower
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294-4003
303-844-1571
303-844-0770 (facsimile)
[e-mail]

-1-

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.

B.

Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 12/12/13

C.

4.

Date Complaint Was Filed: 10/17/13

Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 4/9/14

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

To the best of his knowledge, Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate.
To the best of her knowledge, Defendant states that the record is complete and accurate.

5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES
The parties state that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses.

7. OTHER MATTERS
The parties state that there are no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court. This case is
not an appeal from a decision issued on remand from this Court.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.

Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: 6/9/14

B.

Defendant’s Response Brief Due: 7/9/14

C.

Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 7/24/14

-2-

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.

Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.

B.

Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A.

( X ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.

B.

( ) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.

11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS
OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.

DATED this 29th day of April, 2014.
BY THE COURT:

s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

-3-

APPROVED:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
OK/JLK
s/1
Ronald C. Calhoun
P.O. Box 44211
Denver, CO 80201-4421
720-975-3303
Pro se Plaintiff

By: s/ David I. Blower
David I. Blower
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294-4003
303-844-1571
303-844-0770 (facsimile)
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant

1

A scanned pdf version of the Joint Case Management Plan, which was filed, includes Plaintiff’s
ink signature.
-4-