Urioste v. Colvin

Filing 12

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 6/16/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 7/16/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 7/31/2014 by Judge John L. Kane on 05/05/14. (jhawk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-02855-AP RICHARD URIOSTE, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES -1- 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: Joseph A. Whitcomb Rocky Mountain Disability Group 1391 Speer Blvd., Suite 705 Denver, CO 80204 (303) 534-1954 (303) 534-1949 joe@RMDLG.com For Defendant: John F. Walsh United States Attorney J. Benedict García Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney’s Office District of Colorado J.B.Garcia@usdoj.gov Alexess D. Rea Special Assistant United States Attorney 1961 Stout, Suite 4169 Denver, Colorado 80294-4003 303-844-7101 303-844-0770 (facsimile) Alexess.rea@ssa.gov 2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. Date Complaint Was Filed: October 18, 2013 B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: February 12, 2014 C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: April 14, 2014 -2- 4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD The parties state that, to the best of their knowledge, the record is complete and accurate. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE The parties do not anticipate any additional evidence. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES The parties state that this case does not appear to raise unusual claims or defenses. 7. OTHER MATTERS The parties are not aware of any other matters. 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE A. B. C. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: June 16, 2014 Defendant’s Response Brief Due: July 16, 2014 Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: July 31, 2014 9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument. B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument. 10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE Indicate below the parties' consent choice. A. ( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. B. ( X ) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. 11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. -3- DATED this 5th day of May, 2014. BY THE COURT: S/John L. Kane U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE APPROVED: John F. Walsh United States Attorney s/ Joseph A. Whitcomb By: s/ Alexess D. Rea Joseph A. Whitcomb Alexess D. Rea Rocky Mountain Disability Group 1391 Speer, Suite 705 Denver, CO 80204 (303) 534-1958 (303) 534-1949 (facsimile) joe@RMDLG.com Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 1961 Stout St., Suite 4169 Denver, CO 80294-4003 (303) 844-7101 (303) 844-0770 (facsimile) alexess.rea@ssa.gov Attorney for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?