Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 34

MINUTE ORDER granting 31 Motion for status. Plaintiff is advised that his social security appeal will be handled in due course. Motion for Status & Acknowledgment of Non-Consent of Magistrate Judge & Request for Scheduling Conference 33 , is denied as moot in part and denied in part. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 1/7/2015. (tscha, ) Modified on 1/8/2015 to correct judge(tscha, ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02890-KLM
RODERICK RAY BROWN,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER1
The matters before me are plaintiff’s (1) Motion for Status [#31],2 filed
December 15, 2014; and (2) Motion for Status & Acknowledgment of Non-Consent
of Magistrate Judge & Request for Scheduling Conference [#33], filed January 7,
2015. I grant the December motion and inform the pro se plaintiff that the case is on the
court’s docket and will be resolved in due course. I deny the January motion in part as
moot to the extent it merely reiterates the relief requested in the December motion. I
deny it insofar as it seeks a scheduling conference. This case is fully ripe for
determination and there are no matters which require the convening of a scheduling
conference.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Motion for Status [#31], filed December 15, 2014, is GRANTED,
and plaintiff is advised that his social security appeal will be handled in due course; and
2. That the Motion for Status & Acknowledgment of Non-Consent of
Magistrate Judge & Request for Scheduling Conference [#33], filed January 7,
2015, is DENIED AS MOOT IN PART to the extent it seeks the same relief requested in
the prior motion, and DENIED IN PART to the extent it purports to request the setting of
a scheduling conference in this matter.
Dated: January 7, 2015.

1
This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E.
Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.
2

“[#31]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.