Brooks v. Oba et al

Filing 83

ORDER Granting Service by United States Marshal of 68 Second Amended Prisoner Complaint, filed by Jason Brooks, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 05/19/15. (nmarb, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-02894-CBS JASON BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. DAVID OBA, PATRICK BLAKE, ANGIE TURNER, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, DEBRA FOSTER, JULIE RUSSELL, KATHY HOWELL, TIM CREANY, DAVID TESSIERE, DOLORES MONTOYA, and TRUDY SICOTTE, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL Magistrate Judge Shaffer This matter comes before the court for service of the Second Amended Prisoner Complaint [Doc. 68] on Defendant Trudy Sicotte. Pursuant to the Order Referring Case dated July 1, 2014 [Doc. 44], this case was referred to the Magistrate Judge. On October 24, 2013, Mr. Brooks was granted permission to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915. [See Doc. 5]. It is now ORDERED that, if appropriate, pursuant to supplemental information provided by Mr. Brooks, the Clerk of the Court shall attempt to obtain a waiver of service from Defendant Trudy Sicotte at Fremont Correctional Facility, P.O. Box 999, Canon City, CO 81215. If the Clerk is 1 unable to do so, the United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the Second Amended Prisoner Complaint [Doc. 68] and summons upon Defendant Sicotte. If appropriate, the Marshal shall first attempt to obtain a waiver of service of these documents pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, following service of process upon her, Defendant Sicotte shall respond to the Second Amended Prisoner Complaint [Doc. 68] in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 19th day of May, 2015. BY THE COURT: s/Craig B. Shaffer_________ United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?