Stockmar v. Colorado School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Inc.

Filing 198

AMENDED ORDER re: 197 Order on Motion for Release of Funds. The Court hereby amends its prior Order (Doc. # 197 ) and ORDERS as follows: the Registry of this Court is directed to issue payment in the principal amount of $50,106.47, plus any interest that has accrued to date. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 12/22/2015. (athom, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Christine M. Arguello Civil Action No. 13-cv-02906-CMA-MJW VANESSA STOCKMAR, TANYA CARLETON, Plaintiffs, v. COLORADO SCHOOL OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE, INC., a Colorado corporation, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________ AMENDED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF CARLETON’S MOTION TO DISBURSE FUNDS CURRENTLY HELD IN THE COURT’S REGISTRY ______________________________________________________________________ This matter is before the Court on the Court’s prior Order (Doc. # 197) Granting Plaintiff Tanya Carleton’s Motion to Disburse Funds Currently Held in the Court’s Registry, filed in accordance with this Court’s prior Orders of June 8, 2015 and June 9, 2015. (Doc. ## 144, 145). The Court’s prior Order inadvertently omitted a direction for the Registry of the Court to issue any interest that has accrued to date, in addition to the principal amount of $50,106.47. (See Doc. # 197.) As such, the Court hereby amends its prior Order (Doc. # 197) and ORDERS as follows: the Registry of this Court is directed to issue payment in the principal amount of $50,106.47, plus any interest that has accrued to date, to: Elwyn F. Schaefer & Associates, P.C. 460 So. Marion Pkwy., Ste. 1704 Denver, CO 80209 DATED: December 22, 2015 BY THE COURT: _______________________________ CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?