Garcia v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
ORDER Overruling 35 Plaintiff's Objections to the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.72(a). By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 6/2/2014. (klyon, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02937-REB-BNB
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.,
ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS
TO THE RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 72(a)
The matter before me is Plaintiff’s Objections to the Recommendation of
United States Magistrate Judge Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) [#35],1 filed May 2,
2014. I overrule the objections.
Plaintiff’s objections pertain to non-dispositive matters that were referred to the
magistrate judge for resolution. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(a), I may modify or set aside any portion of a magistrate judge’s order which I find to
be clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s order
and the transcript of the apposite hearing; the apposite motion, response, and reply;
plaintiff’s objections; and defendant’s response thereto, I conclude that the magistrate
judge’s order is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
“[#35]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
THEREFORE, IT IS ordered that Plaintiff’s Objections to the
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(a) [#35], filed May 2, 2014, are OVERRULED.
Dated June 2, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?