Headley v. Colvin
Filing
14
ORDER- JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN: SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 3/31/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 4/30/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 5/15/2014. By Judge John L. Kane on 2/27/2014. (trlee, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-2989-AP
PATRICIA HEADLEY
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
1.
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Ann J. Atkinson, Esq.
7960 South Ireland Way
Aurora, CO 80016
Telephone: (303) 680-1881
Facsimile: (303) 680-7891
Email: AtkinsonAJ@aol.com
For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
J. Benedict García
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
Email: J.B.Garcia@usdoj.gov
James Burgess
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration, Region VIII
Office of the General Counsel
1961 Stout St., Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294-4003
Telephone: (303) 844-1856
Facsimile: (303) 844-0770
Email: james.burgess@ssa.gov
2.
STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3.
DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.
Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: November 12, 2013
C.
4.
Date Complaint Was Filed: October 31, 2013
Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: February 7, 2014
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and
accurate.
5.
STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Neither party intends to submit additional evidence.
6.
STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL
CLAIMS OR DEFENSES
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe this case raises any unusual claims or
defenses.
7.
OTHER MATTERS
The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court. This case is not on
appeal from a decision issued on remand from this Court.
8.
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Counsel for both parties conferred and agreed upon the following proposed briefing schedule:
A.
Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: March 31, 2014
B.
Defendant’s Response Brief Due: April 30, 2014
C.
Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: May 15, 2014
9.
STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.
B.
10.
Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.
CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A.
All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
B.
11.
( )
(X)
All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES
MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A
COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S
CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon
a showing of good cause.
DATED this 27th day of February, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
s/Ann J. Atkinson
Ann J. Atkinson, Esq.
7960 South Ireland Way
Aurora, CO 80016
(303) 680-1881
(303) 680-7891 (fax)
AtkinsonAJ@aol.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
J. BENEDICT GARCÍA
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
District of Colorado
s/ James Burgess
James Burgess
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration, Region VIII
Office of the General Counsel
1961 Stout St., Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294-4003
Telephone: (303) 844-1856
Facsimile: (303) 844-0770 (fax)
Email: james.burgess@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?