Headley v. Colvin

Filing 14

ORDER- JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN: SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 3/31/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 4/30/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 5/15/2014. By Judge John L. Kane on 2/27/2014. (trlee, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-2989-AP PATRICIA HEADLEY Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: Ann J. Atkinson, Esq. 7960 South Ireland Way Aurora, CO 80016 Telephone: (303) 680-1881 Facsimile: (303) 680-7891 Email: AtkinsonAJ@aol.com For Defendant: John F. Walsh United States Attorney J. Benedict García Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney’s Office Email: J.B.Garcia@usdoj.gov James Burgess Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration, Region VIII Office of the General Counsel 1961 Stout St., Suite 4169 Denver, CO 80294-4003 Telephone: (303) 844-1856 Facsimile: (303) 844-0770 Email: james.burgess@ssa.gov 2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: November 12, 2013 C. 4. Date Complaint Was Filed: October 31, 2013 Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: February 7, 2014 STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and accurate. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE Neither party intends to submit additional evidence. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe this case raises any unusual claims or defenses. 7. OTHER MATTERS The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court. This case is not on appeal from a decision issued on remand from this Court. 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE Counsel for both parties conferred and agreed upon the following proposed briefing schedule: A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: March 31, 2014 B. Defendant’s Response Brief Due: April 30, 2014 C. Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: May 15, 2014 9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. B. 10. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE A. All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. B. 11. ( ) (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED this 27th day of February, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/John L. Kane U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE APPROVED: s/Ann J. Atkinson Ann J. Atkinson, Esq. 7960 South Ireland Way Aurora, CO 80016 (303) 680-1881 (303) 680-7891 (fax) AtkinsonAJ@aol.com Attorney for Plaintiff JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney J. BENEDICT GARCÍA Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado s/ James Burgess James Burgess Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration, Region VIII Office of the General Counsel 1961 Stout St., Suite 4169 Denver, CO 80294-4003 Telephone: (303) 844-1856 Facsimile: (303) 844-0770 (fax) Email: james.burgess@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?