LuxeYard, Inc. v. Bell et al

Filing 17

MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 11 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Original Complaint and 12 Motion to Dismiss. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 2/7/2014.(klyon, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 13–cv–02990–MSK–KMT KHALED ALATTAR, Plaintiff, v. AARON BELL, CHRISTOPHER BELL, RACHEL BELL and WILLIAM BELL, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA In light of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 13, filed Feb. 3, 2014), which was filed as a matter of course pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1), Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 12, filed Jan. 13, 2014) and Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Original Complaint (Doc. No. 11, filed Dec. 18, 2013) are DENIED as moot. See, e.g., Brunet v. The Quizno’s Franchize Co. LLC, No. 07–cv–01717–EWN–KMT, 2008 WL 4380590, at *1 (D. Colo. Sept. 24, 2008). Dated: February 7, 2014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?