LuxeYard, Inc. v. Bell et al
Filing
17
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 11 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Original Complaint and 12 Motion to Dismiss. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 2/7/2014.(klyon, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 13–cv–02990–MSK–KMT
KHALED ALATTAR,
Plaintiff,
v.
AARON BELL,
CHRISTOPHER BELL,
RACHEL BELL and
WILLIAM BELL,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA
In light of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 13, filed Feb. 3, 2014), which was filed as a
matter of course pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1), Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No.
12, filed Jan. 13, 2014) and Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Original
Complaint (Doc. No. 11, filed Dec. 18, 2013) are DENIED as moot. See, e.g., Brunet v. The
Quizno’s Franchize Co. LLC, No. 07–cv–01717–EWN–KMT, 2008 WL 4380590, at *1 (D.
Colo. Sept. 24, 2008).
Dated: February 7, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?