Bland v. Allan et al
MINUTE ORDER denying 50 plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 51 Motion for Production of Documents Under Rule (34). By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/11/2014.(mjwcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-03000-CMA-MJW
OFF. MICHAEL ALLAN, Official & Individual,
CITY OF AURORA, and
OFF. EWERT, Official & Individual,
Entered by U. S. Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel
(Docket No. 50) is denied without prejudice for the reasons stated in this court’s Minutes
Orders of January 7, 2014 (Docket No. 28), and January 14, 2014 (Docket No. 31).
It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff’s Motion for Production of Documents
Under Rule (34) (Docket No. 51) is denied. As this court explained in its Minute Order
of February 13, 2014 (Docket No. 43), which denied a similar motion, plaintiff may seek
documents from any other party pursuant to the provisions of the Scheduling Order
entered in this case and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 34, which does not require a
Date: March 11, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?