Brooks v. Raemisch et al

Filing 18

ORDER for State Court Record and to Answer, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/11/2014. (slibi, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-03013-BNB KEITH BROOKS, Applicant, v. RICK RAEMISCH, Exec Director Colorado Dept of Corrections, BOBBY BONNER, Warden, Limon Correctional Facility, and JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney General, State of Colorado, Respondents. ORDER FOR STATE COURT RECORD AND TO ANSWER After preliminary consideration of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Filed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, IT IS ORDERED: (1) Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order the Respondents shall file with the Clerk of the Court, in electronic format if available, a copy of the complete record of Applicant’s state court proceedings in People v. Brooks, El Paso County District Court Case Number 05CR5346, including all documents in the state court file and transcripts of all proceedings conducted in the state court, but excluding any physical evidence (as opposed to documentary evidence) not relevant to the asserted claims; (2) Within thirty (30) days from the date the state court record is provided to the Court, Respondent(s) shall file an Answer conforming to the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts; (3) Within thirty (30) days from the date the Respondents file an Answer, Applicant may file a Reply if he desires; and (4) The Clerk of the Court is directed to send copies of this order to the following: (1) Clerk of the Court El Paso County District Court P.O. Box 2980 Colorado Springs, Colorado 80901; (2) Court Services Manager State Court Administrator’s Office 1300 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80203. DATED March 11, 2014, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?