Brooks v. Raemisch et al
Filing
18
ORDER for State Court Record and to Answer, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/11/2014. (slibi, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-03013-BNB
KEITH BROOKS,
Applicant,
v.
RICK RAEMISCH, Exec Director Colorado Dept of Corrections,
BOBBY BONNER, Warden, Limon Correctional Facility, and
JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney General, State of Colorado,
Respondents.
ORDER FOR STATE COURT RECORD AND TO ANSWER
After preliminary consideration of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
Filed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, IT IS ORDERED:
(1)
Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order the Respondents
shall file with the Clerk of the Court, in electronic format if available, a copy of the
complete record of Applicant’s state court proceedings in People v. Brooks, El Paso
County District Court Case Number 05CR5346, including all documents in the state
court file and transcripts of all proceedings conducted in the state court, but excluding
any physical evidence (as opposed to documentary evidence) not relevant to the
asserted claims;
(2)
Within thirty (30) days from the date the state court record is provided
to the Court, Respondent(s) shall file an Answer conforming to the requirements of
Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts;
(3)
Within thirty (30) days from the date the Respondents file an Answer,
Applicant may file a Reply if he desires; and
(4)
The Clerk of the Court is directed to send copies of this order to the
following:
(1)
Clerk of the Court
El Paso County District Court
P.O. Box 2980
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80901;
(2)
Court Services Manager
State Court Administrator’s Office
1300 Broadway
Denver, Colorado 80203.
DATED March 11, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?