Ward v. Colvin

Filing 11

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 5/27/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 6/27/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 7/11/2014 by Judge John L. Kane on 04/15/14. (jhawk, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-03029-AP
KIM BENEFIELD WARD,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Karl E. Osterhout, Esq.
Osterhout Disability Law, LLC
521 Cedar Way, Suite 200
Oakmont, PA 15139
Ph.: 412-794-8003
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
J. Benedict Garcia
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
[e-mail]
Christina J. Valerio
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel, Region VIII
1961 Stout Street
Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294-4003
303-844-7348
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

-1-

2.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3.

DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.

B.

Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: January 27, 2014

C.
4.

Date Complaint Was Filed: November 6, 2013

Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: March 26, 2014

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

To the best of her knowledge, Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate.
To the best of her knowledge, Defendant states that the record is complete and accurate.

5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.

6.

STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES

The parties state that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses.

7.

OTHER MATTERS

The parties state that there are no other matters.

8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A.

Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: May 27, 2014

B.

Defendant’s Response Brief Due: June 27, 2014

C.

Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: July 11, 2014

-2-

9.

STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.

B.

10.

Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.

Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A.

B.

11.

(

)

All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.

( X ) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.

AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS
OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.

DATED this 15th day of April, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVED:

John F. Walsh
United States Attorney

s/ Karl E. Osterhout
KARL E. OSTERHOUT, ESQ.
521 Cedar Way, Suite 200
Oakmont, PA 15139
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 412-794-8050
[e-mail]

s/ Christina J. Valerio
By: CHRISTINA J. VALERIO
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Social Security Administration, Region VIII
Office of the General Counsel
1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294-4003
303-844-7348
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
-3-