Branson v. Price et al
Filing
31
ORDER Dismissing Claims 5 and 6 of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. The Stipulation [#30]] is Approved. Status Report due by 5/16/2014. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 5/5/2014. (klyon, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 13-cv-03090-REB-BNB
GARY BRANSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMERCE CITY POLICE OFFICER ROBERT PRICE, in his official and individual
capacity,
COMMERCE CITY COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER ARICA BORES, in her official
and individual capacity,
COMMERCE CITY POLICE OFFICER CHRISTOPHER CASTILLO, in his official and
individual capacity, and
CITY OF COMMERCE CITY, COLORADO,
Defendants.
ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS 5 AND 6 OF
PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Blackburn, J.
The matter is before me on the Stipulation to Dismiss Claims 5 and 6 of
Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand [#30]1 filed May 5, 2014.
After reviewing the stipulation and the record, I conclude that the stipulation should be
approved and that claims five and six of the First Amended Complaint and Jury
Demand [#9] filed February 25, 2014, should be dismissed with prejudice.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Stipulation to Dismiss Claims 5 and 6 of Plaintiff’s First
1
“[#3]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.
Amended Complaint and Jury Demand [#30] filed May 5, 2014, is APPROVED;
2. That claims five and six of the First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand
[#9] filed February 25, 2014, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay
their own attorney fees and costs; and
3. That by May 16, 2014, plaintiff shall file a status report identifying the claims
that remain for determination.
Dated May 5, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?