Branson v. Price et al

Filing 76

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS: The 72 Stipulation to Dismiss Defendants Bores, Castillo, and City of Commerce City and Claims 2, 3, 4, 7,and 8 with prejudice is APPROVED. The claims of the plaintiff against defendants, Commerce City Com munity Services Officer Arica Bores, in her official and individual capacity, Commerce City Police Office Christopher Castillo, in his official and individual capacity and City of Commerce City, Colorado are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Claims 2, 3, 4, 7, and 8 are DISMMED WITH PREJUDICE, and each affected party shall pay its own attorney fees and costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/23/2014. (alowe)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 13-cv-03090-REB-BNB
GARY BRANSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMERCE CITY POLICE OFFICER ROBERT PRICE, in his official and individual
capacity,
COMMERCE CITY COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER ARICA BORES, in her official
and individual capacity,
COMMERCE CITY POLICE OFFICER CHRISTOPHER CASTILLO, in his official and
individual capacity, and
CITY OF COMMERCE CITY, COLORADO,
Defendants.

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS
Blackburn, J.
The matter before me is the Stipulation to Dismiss Defendants Bores,
Castillo, and City of Commerce City and Claims 2, 3, 4, 7,and 8 With Prejudice
[#72]1 filed December 12, 2014. After reviewing the motion and the record, I conclude
that the motion should be granted.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Stipulation to Dismiss Defendants Bores, Castillo, and City of
Commerce City and Claims 2, 3, 4, 7,and 8 With Prejudice [#72] is APPROVED; and
2. That the claims of the plaintiff against defendants, COMMERCE CITY
1

“[#72]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.

COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER ARICA BORES, in her official and individual
capacity, COMMERCE CITY POLICE OFFICER CHRISTOPHER CASTILLO, in his
official and individual capacity, and CITY OF COMMERCE CITY, COLORADO, are

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
3. That defendants COMMERCE CITY COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER
ARICA BORES, in her official and individual capacity, COMMERCE CITY POLICE
OFFICER CHRISTOPHER CASTILLO, in his official and individual capacity, and CITY
OF COMMERCE CITY, COLORADO, are DROPPED as named parties to this action,

and the case caption is amended accordingly;
4. That Claims 2, 3, 4, 7, and 8 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and
5. That each affected party SHALL PAY its own attorney fees and costs.
Dated December 23, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:

2