Santos v. Geico Indemnity Company
ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The parties are ordered to set an initial scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 no later than 45 days after the answer, motion to dismiss or other response to the complaint is filed. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 11/26/2013. (rbjsec.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge R. Brooke Jackson
Civil Action No 13-cv-03140-RBJ
JOHNNY D. SANTOS,
GEICO INEMNITY COMPANY,
ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. The parties are ordered to set an initial
scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and
D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 no later than 45 days after the answer, motion to dismiss or other
response to the complaint is filed. Each party’s lead trial counsel shall attend the conference.
The conference shall be held in Courtroom A-902, Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse, 901 19th
Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties are directed to jointly contact Chambers by telephone at
(303) 844-4694 or by email at Jackson_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov to obtain a scheduling
A meeting for the purposes of attempting to agree on a scheduling order and satisfying
the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) should be held no later than 21 days before the
proposed scheduling order is tendered. The proposed scheduling order, which should be
prepared as described in Appendix F to the local rules, should be tendered no later than five days
before the scheduling conference. The proposed scheduling order should set forth the parties’
agreement or their respective positions on the matters set forth in Appendix F. A copy of
instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form scheduling order can be
downloaded from the Court’s website
DATED this 26th day of November, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
R. Brooke Jackson
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?