Carl v. Colvin

Filing 17

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 7/18/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 8/19/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 8/29/2014 by Judge John L. Kane on 07/10/14. (jhawk, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-03146-JLK
Julie Carl,
Plaintiff,
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:

For Defendant:

Tracy Stewart
Stewart Law Offices, P.C.
123 N. College Ave., Ste. 200
Fort Collins, CO 80524
970-402-9584
866-224-4944 (fax)
[e-mail]

John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
J. Benedict García
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
[e-mail]
M. Thayne Warner
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1961 Stout, Suite 4169
Denver, Colorado 80294-4003
303-844-7237
303-844-0770 (fax)
[e-mail]

2.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
-1-

3.

DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.

Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 01/13/14

C.
4.

Date Complaint Was Filed: 11/19/13

Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 03/12/14

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
The parties state that the administrative record appears to be complete and accurate.

5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Neither party intends to submit additional evidence.

6.

STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL
CLAIMS OR DEFENSES
Neither party contemplates unusual claims or defenses.

7.

OTHER MATTERS
The parties are not aware of any other matters at this time. The case is not on remand from
a court decision.

8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.
B.

Defendant’s Response Brief Due: August 19, 2014

C.
9.

Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: July 18, 2014

Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: August 29, 2014

STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.

Plaintiff’s Statement.

Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B.

Defendant's Statement:

Defendant does not request oral argument.
-2-

10.

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A.

B.

11.

(

)

(x)

All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.

AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL
ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a
showing of good cause.
DATED this 10th day of July 2014.
BY THE COURT:

s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
s/ Tracy Stewart
Tracy Stewart
Stewart Law Offices, P.C.
123 N. College Ave., Ste. 200
Fort Collins, CO 80524
970-402-9584
866-224-4944 (fax)
[e-mail]

By: s/ M. Thayne Warner
M. Thayne Warner
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
1961 Stout St., Suite 4169
Denver CO 80294-4003
303-844-7237
303-844-0770 (fax)
[e-mail]

Attorney for Plaintiff

Attorneys for Defendant
-3-