Crew Tile Distribution, Inc. v. Porcelanosa Los Angeles, Inc. et al
Filing
210
ORDER; After review of the proposed Final Pretrial Order 208 , this court is satisfied that the parties have met their obligations pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(e) and a further telephonic conference at this stage would not be productive. The proposed Final Pretrial Order shall be entered as an Order of Court. The telephonic conference scheduled on April 7, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. is VACATED, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/6/16. (morti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 13–cv–03206–WJM–KMT
CREW TILE DISTRIBUTION, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
PORCELANOSA LOS ANGELES, INC.,
PORCELANOSA NEW YORK, INC.,
PORCELANOSA TEXAS, INC., and
PROVEN, LTD., all d/b/a PORCELANOSA USA,
Defendants, Counterclaimants and Third-Party Plaintiffs,
v.
RYAN A. DAVIS, an individual,
DARLYNE A. DAVIS, an individual,
GLENN L. DAVIS, an individual,
SHANA L. BASTEMEYER, an individual,
PARADIGM TILE & STONE DISTRIBUTORS, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company,
and
G&D DAVIS HOLDINGS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company,
Third-Party Defendants.
ORDER
A Final Pretrial Conference is scheduled for April 7, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. In accordance
with this court directions to counsel at the time of the Scheduling Conference, the parties have
timely submitted a proposed Final Pretrial Order for the court’s consideration.
After review of the proposed Final Pretrial Order [Doc. No. 208], this court is satisfied
that the parties have met their obligations pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(e) and a further
telephonic conference at this stage would not be productive. The proposed Final Pretrial Order
shall be entered as an Order of Court.
The telephonic conference scheduled on April 7, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. is VACATED.
Dated April 6, 2016.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?