Torres Roman v. Colvin et al

Filing 13

ORDER: Joint case management plan. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 5/19/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 7/11/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 7/28/2014. by Judge John L. Kane on 4/9/2014. (trlee, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-03215-AP
Javier Torres Roman,
Plaintiff,
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Kathleen W. Robinson
3780 S. Broadway
Englewood CO 80113
(303)3290-6400 (phone)
[phone] (facsimile)
[e-mail]
For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
J. Benedict García
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
[e-mail]
James L. Burgess
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Denver CO 80202
[phone] (phone)
[e-mail]

-1-

2.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3.

DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.

B.

Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 12/23/13

C.
4.

Date Complaint Was Filed: 11/25/13

Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 3/19/14

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

To the best of his knowledge, Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate.
To the best of her knowledge, Defendant states that the record is complete and accurate.

5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.
6.

STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES

The parties state that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses.
7.

OTHER MATTERS

The parties state that there are no other matters.

8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A.

Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: 5/19/14

B.

Defendant’s Response Brief Due: 7/11/14

C.

Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 7/28/14

The parties have agreed to extend the time for Defendant’s response brief because counsel for
Defendant will be on pre-approved leave June 9-20, 2014, and because of counsel’s briefing
schedule following return from this leave. OK - JLK
-2-

9.

STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A.

B.

10.

Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.

Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A.

B.

11.

(

)

( x)

All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.

AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS
OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.

DATED this 9th day of April, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
S/John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVED:

John F. Walsh,
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
-3-

/s/ Kathleen W. Robinson

By: /s/ James L. Burgess

Kathleen W. Robinson
3780 S. Broadway
Englewood CO 80113
[phone] (phone)
[phone] (facsimile)
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff

Special Assistant United States Attorney
1961 Stout Street Ste 4169
Denver CO 80294-4003
[phone] (phone)
[e-mail]
Attorney for Defendant

-4-