Ray v. N.A.R. Inc.
Filing
11
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 3/7/2014 at 02:30 PM in Conference Room, proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on February 27, 2014, lead counsel present in person, and initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) will be completed no later than 10 calendar days before the scheduling conference, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/17/2014. (rpmcd)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Civil Action No. 13-cv-03226-RPM
PAMELA S. RAY,
Plaintiff,
v.
N.A.R. INC.,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
_____________________________________________________________________
Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 16, it is
ORDERED that a scheduling conference will be held on March 7, 2014, at 2:30
p.m. in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States
Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. Counsel are directed to comply with
the Instructions for Preparation of Scheduling Order which may be found at
http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/CourtOperations/RulesProcedures/JudicialPracticeStandards/SeniorArticleIII
Judges/HonRichardPMatsch.aspx (Senior
Judge Richard P. Matsch Procedures) and use the
format provided with those instructions (Rev. 11/11). The proposed order (original only)
on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on February 27, 2014.
The conference is conducted with lead counsel present in person. No parties or
representatives of parties will be permitted to attend.
Initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) will be completed no later than 10 calendar
days before the scheduling conference.
Dated: January 17th, 2014
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
________________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?