Hayes v. Lowe et al

Filing 47

ORDER denying 44 Plaintiff's Motion to Set Aside this Court's Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 2/26/2015. (ebuch)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE Civil Case No. 13-cv-03239-LTB-KMT LEVOLIA L. HAYES, Plaintiff, v. JAMES LOWE, CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE COMPANIES, and CLIF NORTHAM, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ________________________________________________________________________ Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Set Aside this Court’s Order on Defendants Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (6) (Doc 44). Defendants have filed a response to her motion. I have considered her motion together with the response and file in this case under both Colo.R.Civ.P. 59(e) and 60(b), I conclude that Plaintiff has not shown cause to set aside under either Rules 60(b) or 59(e). Accordingly IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Set Aside (Doc 44) is DENIED. BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock Lewis T. Babcock, Judge DATED: February 26, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?