Hayes v. Lowe et al

Filing 47

ORDER denying 44 Plaintiff's Motion to Set Aside this Court's Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 2/26/2015. (ebuch)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE
Civil Case No. 13-cv-03239-LTB-KMT
LEVOLIA L. HAYES,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES LOWE,
CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE COMPANIES, and
CLIF NORTHAM,
Defendants.
________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
________________________________________________________________________

Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Set Aside this Court’s Order on Defendants Motion to
Dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (6) (Doc 44). Defendants have filed a
response to her motion. I have considered her motion together with the response and file
in this case under both Colo.R.Civ.P. 59(e) and 60(b), I conclude that Plaintiff has not
shown cause to set aside under either Rules 60(b) or 59(e). Accordingly
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Set Aside (Doc 44) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:

s/Lewis T. Babcock
Lewis T. Babcock, Judge
DATED:

February 26, 2015