Chiles v. Colvin et al
Filing
11
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (ORDER). SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 4/10/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 5/28/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 6/12/2014. By Judge John L. Kane on 2/21/14. (mfiel, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-03255-AP
VALARIE D. CHILES
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
_____________________________________________________________________________
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
For Defendant:
ROBERT K. GRUBER
Attorney at Law
3500 S Wadsworth Blvd., Suite 215
Lakewood, CO 80235-2382
Telephone: 303-986-6400
Fax: 303-986-6800
Email: bobgruber@earthlink.net
JOHN F. WALSH,
United States Attorney
District of Colorado
J. BENEDICT GARCIA,
Assistant United States Attorney
THOMAS H. KRAUS
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Assistant Regional Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294-4003
(303) 844-0017
Tom.kraus@ssa.gov
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. ยง
405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint Was Filed: November 29, 2013
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: December 13, 2013
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: February 4, 2014
4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
To the best of his knowledge, Counsel for the Plaintiff states that the Administrative record is
complete and accurate.
To the best of his knowledge, Counsel for the Defendant states that the Administrative record is
complete and accurate.
5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES
To the best of his knowledge, Counsel for the Plaintiff states that this case does not involve
unusual claims or defenses.
To the best of his knowledge, Counsel for the Defendant states that this case does not involve
unusual claims or defenses.
7. OTHER MATTERS
There are no other matters.
8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: April 10, 2014
B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: May 28, 2014
C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: June 12, 2014
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument
B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument
10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate
Judge.
11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES
MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A
COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S
CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a
showing of good cause.
DATED this 21st day of February, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane______________
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
For Plaintiff:
For Defendant:
s/ Robert K. Gruber
ROBERT K. GRUBER
Attorney at Law
3500 S. Wadsworth Blvd., Suite 215
Lakewood, CO 80235-2382
Telephone: 303-986-6400
Fax: 303-986-6800
Email: bobgruber@earthlink.net
JOHN F. WALSH,
United States Attorney
District of Colorado
J. BENEDICT GARCIA
Assistant United States Attorney
s/ Thomas H. Kraus
THOMAS H. KRAUS
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Assistant Regional Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294-4003
(303) 844-0017
Tom.kraus@ssa.gov
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?