Chiles v. Colvin et al

Filing 11

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (ORDER). SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 4/10/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 5/28/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 6/12/2014. By Judge John L. Kane on 2/21/14. (mfiel, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-03255-AP VALARIE D. CHILES Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES _____________________________________________________________________________ 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: For Defendant: ROBERT K. GRUBER Attorney at Law 3500 S Wadsworth Blvd., Suite 215 Lakewood, CO 80235-2382 Telephone: 303-986-6400 Fax: 303-986-6800 Email: bobgruber@earthlink.net JOHN F. WALSH, United States Attorney District of Colorado J. BENEDICT GARCIA, Assistant United States Attorney THOMAS H. KRAUS Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169 Denver, CO 80294-4003 (303) 844-0017 Tom.kraus@ssa.gov 2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. ยง 405(g). 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. Date Complaint Was Filed: November 29, 2013 B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: December 13, 2013 C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: February 4, 2014 4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD To the best of his knowledge, Counsel for the Plaintiff states that the Administrative record is complete and accurate. To the best of his knowledge, Counsel for the Defendant states that the Administrative record is complete and accurate. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES To the best of his knowledge, Counsel for the Plaintiff states that this case does not involve unusual claims or defenses. To the best of his knowledge, Counsel for the Defendant states that this case does not involve unusual claims or defenses. 7. OTHER MATTERS There are no other matters. 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: April 10, 2014 B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: May 28, 2014 C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: June 12, 2014 9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument 10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. 11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED this 21st day of February, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/John L. Kane______________ U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE APPROVED: For Plaintiff: For Defendant: s/ Robert K. Gruber ROBERT K. GRUBER Attorney at Law 3500 S. Wadsworth Blvd., Suite 215 Lakewood, CO 80235-2382 Telephone: 303-986-6400 Fax: 303-986-6800 Email: bobgruber@earthlink.net JOHN F. WALSH, United States Attorney District of Colorado J. BENEDICT GARCIA Assistant United States Attorney s/ Thomas H. Kraus THOMAS H. KRAUS Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169 Denver, CO 80294-4003 (303) 844-0017 Tom.kraus@ssa.gov

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?