Romo v. Colvin
Filing
17
ORDER: Joint Case Management Plan. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 6/16/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 7/16/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 8/15/2014. by Judge John L. Kane on 4/8/2014. (trlee, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action NO.1: 13-cv-3259-AP
Darlene Romo (f/k/a Sigala)
Plaintiff,
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
________________________________________________________________________
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Kenneth Shakeshaft
1935 Jamboree Drive, Suite 202
Colorado Springs, CO 80920
719-635-5886
office@shakeshaftlawfirm.com
For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
J. Benedict Garcia
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
District of Colorado
Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Denver, Colorado 80294
303-844-0815 303-844-0770 (facsimile)
Stephanie.kiley@ssa.gov
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42
U.S.C. § 405(g).
3.
DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint Was Filed: 12/3/13
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 12/18/13
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 3/12/14
4.
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
To the best of his knowledge, Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate.
To the best of her knowledge, Defendant states that the record is complete and accurate.
5.
STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES
The parties state that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses.
7.
OTHER MATTERS
The parties state that there are no other matters.
8.
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due:
June 16, 2014
B. Defendant's Response Brief Due:
July 16, 2014
C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due:
August 15, 2014
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.
10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A. () All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United
States Magistrate Judge.
B. ( X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United
States Magistrate Judge.
11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES
MUST COMPLY WITH THE D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A
COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING PARTY’S CLIENT,
ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended
only upon a showing of good cause.
DATED this 8th day of April, 2014
BY THE COURT:
_s/John L. Kane____________
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
s/ Kenneth J. Shakeshaft
Kenneth J. Shakeshaft
1935 Jamboree Drive
Suite 202
Colorado Springs, CO 80920
719-635-5886
719-635-0966 (facsimile)
office@shakeshaftlawfirm.com
s/ Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1961 Stout Street. Suite 4169
Denver, CO. 80294
303-844-0815
303-844-0770 (facsimile)
stephanie.kiley@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?