Cranmer v. Lino et al
Filing
28
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/23/14. Defendant Robert Lino's Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order 22 is GRANTED. The Scheduling Order is further modified to extend the following deadlines: Affirmative Expert Disclosure Deadline July 29, 2014; Rebuttal Expert Disclosure Deadline August 15, 2014; Dispositive Motion Deadline September 15, 2014; Discovery Deadline September 29, 2014. (lgale)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-03301-WYD-KLM
STACY CRANMER
Plaintiff,
v.
ROBERT A. LINO,
DOMINGO RODRIGUEZ, and
EL PASO-LOS ANGELES LIMOUSINE EXPRESS, INC.,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_______________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Robert Lino’s Unopposed Motion
to Amend Scheduling Order [#22]1 (the “Motion”). As an initial matter, the Motion does
not comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 10.1(e) which states that “[a]ll documents shall be double
spaced.” The Motion is subject to denial on this basis alone. Nevertheless, in the interest
of expedience,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#22] is GRANTED. The Scheduling
Order entered on February 5, 2014 [#18] and amended on April 21, 2014 [#21], is further
modified to extend the following deadlines:
•
•
•
•
Affirmative Expert Disclosure Deadline
Rebuttal Expert Disclosure Deadline
Dispositive Motion Deadline
Discovery Deadline
July 29, 2014
August 15, 2014
September 15, 2014
September 29, 2014
Dated: June 23, 2014
1
“[#22]” is an example of the convention the Court uses to identify the docket number
assigned to a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system
(CM/ECF). The Court uses this convention throughout this Minute Order.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?