Wirth v. Hickenlooper, et al
Filing
106
MINUTE ORDER denying 104 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 11/18/14.(sgrim)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 13–cv–03309–REB–KMT
MARTIN THOMAS WIRTH,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, in his official capacity as Governor of Colorado,
STEPHEN A. GROOME, Judge - 11th District Court Judge,
ARTHUR R. SMITH, Senior Judge – Retired from Mesa County Court,
MICHELLE MILLER, in her official capacity as Public Trustee of Park County,
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, (Nationstar),
JAY BRAY, Chief Executive of Nationstar in his corporate and individual capacity,
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FNMA),
TIMOTHY MAYOPOULOS, Chief Executive of FNMA in his corporate and individual
capacities,
THE CASTLE LAW GROUP, LLC, (CLG),
CYNTHIA LOWERY-GRABER, CLG Attorney,
DEANNA WESTFALL, CLG Attorney,
BRITNEY BEALL-EDER, CLG Attorney,
CHRISTOPHER T. GROEN, CLG Attorney,
LAWRENCE E. CASTLE, Chief Executive of CLG in his corporate and individual capacies,
FRED WEGENER, individually and in his official capacities, and
MARY HAGER, individually,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA
Defendants Nationstar Mortgage LLC, Jay Bray, Federal National Mortgage Association, and
Timothy Mayopoulos’s “Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute” (Doc. No. 104, filed
November 18, 2014) is DENIED.
A pro se litigant is not excused from complying with the rules of the Court and is subject to the
consequences of noncompliance. Ogden v. San Juan Cnty., 32 F.3d 452, 455 (10th Cir.1994)
(citing Nielsen v. Price, 17 F.3d 1276, 1277 (10th Cir . 1994) (insisting that pro se litigants
follow procedural rules and citing various cases dismissing pro se cases for failure to comply
with the rules)). While some district court local rules within the Tenth Circuit authorize
dismissal based solely on a failure to respond, see, e.g., D .C. Kan. L. Civ. R. 7.4, the District of
Colorado’s Civil Local Rules do not specify that failure to respond to a motion may be deemed
as consent to its entry. See D.C.COLO.LCivR. In any event, when dealing with a pro se
plaintiff, the Tenth Circuit has stated its preference for resolution of the substance of a motion to
dismiss despite the pro se plaintiff’s failure to respond. See Issa v. Comp USA, 354 F.3d 1174,
1178 (10th Cir. 2003) (the lack of a response alone is not enough for the court to grant a motion
to dismiss); Persik v. Manpower, Inc., 85 F. App’x 127, 130 (10th Cir. 2003) (same).
In their Motion, Defendants cite Collier v. Artistic Enterprises, Inc., Civil Action No. 06-cv01446-MEH-BNB, 2007 WL 987856, at *2 (D. Colo. Mar. 30, 2007), in support of their
argument that Plaintiff’s case should be dismissed for his failure to respond to the pending
motions to dismiss. However, in Collier, the magistrate judge noted that it had issued an order
to show cause why the plaintiff’s case should not be dismissed for her failure to respond to the
defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of standing or to request an extension of time to file a
response. Id. at *1. The plaintiff failed to respond to the order to show cause. Id. The
magistrate judge determined the plaintiff’s failure to respond to the defendant’s motion to
dismiss and the order to show cause warranted dismissal of the action. Id. at *2. Nevertheless,
the magistrate judge also addressed the merits of the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of
standing and granted that motion in part. Id. at *2-4.
Thus, this court will issue recommendations on the various defendants’ motions to dismiss in
due course, regardless of whether Plaintiff has filed responses to the motions.
Dated: November 18, 2014
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?