Wirth v. Hickenlooper, et al

Filing 55

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 53 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. Rule Civ. Proc.15(a)(1)(B), 15(a)(2). By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/24/2014.(klyon, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 13–cv–03309–REB–KMT MARTIN THOMAS WIRTH, Plaintiff, v. JOHN HICKENLOOPER, in his official capacity as Governor of Colorado, JOHN SUTHERS, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Colorado, STEPHEN A. GROOME, in his official capacity as 11th District Court Judge, VICKI ARMSTRONG, in her official capacity as Public Trustee of Park County, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, LAWRENCE E. CASTLE, in his corporate and individual capacities, THE CASTLE LAW GROUP, LLC, MARY HAGER, individually, and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FANNIE MAE), Defendants. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA Plaintiff’s “Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 15(a)(1)(B), 15(a)(2)” (Doc. No. 53, filed March 24, 2014) is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff failed to confer with Defendants before filing the present motion. The Tenth Circuit has cautioned that pro se litigants “must follow the same rules of procedure that govern other litigants.” Green v. Dorrell, 969 F.2d 915, 917 (10th Cir. 1992) (“[W]e have repeatedly upheld dismissals in situations where the parties themselves neglected their cases or refused to obey court orders.”(citing cases)). The Local Rules of Practice for the District of Colorado require all parties to confer on motions and other disputes before a motion is filed. D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(a).; see also Visor v. Sprint, No. Civ.A. 96-K-1730, 1997 WL 796989, at *1 (D. Colo. Dec. 31, 1997). Dated: March 24, 2014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?