City of Taylor Police and Fire Retirement System v. Western Union Company, The et al

Filing 109

MINUTE ORDER Granting 106 Lead Plaintiffs' Cross Motion for Entry of Protective Order and Electronically Stored Information Discovery. Protective Order (106-2) is approved as amended; Order Concerning Protocol for Production of Electronically Stored Information (106-1) is approved. Denying 105 Defendants' Motion for Entry of Defendants' Proposed Protective Order and ESI Protocol. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 11/18/2015.(emill)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-03325-MSK-MJW
SEB ASSET MANAGEMENT S.A., and
SEB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AB,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THE WESTERN UNION COMPANY,
HIKMET ERSEK, and
SCOTT T. SCHEIRMAN,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
The parties have filed cross motions for protective orders and for ESI protocol.
(docket nos. 105 and 106). The court has reviewed both motions (docket nos. 105 and
106) and the attached proposed protective orders and ESI protocols. In addition, the
court has taken judicial notice of the court’s file and has considered applicable Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure and case law. For the reasons stated in Lead Plaintiffs’ Cross
Motion for Entry of Protective Order and Electronically Stored Information Discovery
Protocol (docket no. 106), which I incorporate by reference, the Lead Plaintiffs’ Cross
Motion for Entry of Protective Order and Electronically Stored Information Discovery
Protocol (docket no. 106) is GRANTED. The written Protective Order (docket no. 1062) is APPROVED as amended in paragraphs 13 a, 13 c, and 21 and made an Order of
Court. The Order Concerning Protocol for Production of Electronically Stored
Information (docket no. 106-1) is APPROVED and made an Order of Court.
It is hereby FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Entry of
Defendants’ Proposed Protective Order and ESI Protocol (docket no. 105) is DENIED..
Date: November 18, 2015