Hildebrand v. City of Boulder

Filing 58

ORDER granting 55 Plaintiff's Renewed Motion to Dismiss the City of Boulder. The claims of the plaintiff, David L. Hildebrand, against defendant, City of Boulder, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the relevant parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. Party City of Boulder terminated. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/17/2015. (alowe)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 13-cv-03344-REB-MEH
(Consolidated with 14-cv-00425-REB-MEH)
DAVID L. HILDEBRAND,
Plaintiff/Counter Defendant,
v.
CITY OF BOULDER,
Defendant, and
MONROE TRUCK EQUIPMENT,
Defendant/Counter Claimant.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Blackburn, J.
The matter is before me on Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion To dismiss the City of
Boulder [#55]1 filed February 11, 2015. The motion is unopposed. After reviewing the
motion and the record, I conclude that the motion should be granted and that the claims
of the plaintiff against defendant, City of Boulder, should be dismissed with prejudice,
with the relevant parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion To dismiss the City of Boulder [#55] filed
February 11, 2015, is GRANTED;

1

“[#55]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.

2. That the claims of the plaintiff, David L. Hildebrand, against defendant, City of
Boulder, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the relevant parties to pay their own
attorney fees and costs; and
3. That defendant, City of Boulder, is DROPPED as a party to this case, and the
caption shall be AMENDED accordingly.
Dated February 17, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:

2