Pacheco v. Colvin
Filing
13
Joint Case Magnagement Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 5/27/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 6/25/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 7/10/2014 by Judge John L. Kane on 04/16/14. (jhawk, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-03383-AP
Sandria Pacheco
Plaintiff,
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
-1-
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Nicholas D. Purifoy (MO #57816)
Disability Professionals
214 W. 18th St., Suite 100
Kansas City, MO 64108
(816) 221-8800
(816) 221-0078
npurifoy@mydisabilityprofessionals.com
For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
J. Benedict García
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
J.B.Garcia@usdoj.gov
Alexess D. Rea
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1961 Stout, Suite 4169
Denver, Colorado 80294-4003
303-844-7101
303-844-0770 (facsimile)
Alexess.rea@ssa.gov
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
Date Complaint Was Filed: December 16, 2013
B.
Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: January 27, 2014
C.
Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: March 26, 2014
-2-
4.
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
The parties state that, to the best of their knowledge, the record is complete and accurate.
5.
STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
The parties do not anticipate any additional evidence.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES
The parties state that this case does not appear to raise unusual claims or defenses.
7. OTHER MATTERS
The parties are not aware of any other matters.
8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.
B.
C.
Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: May 27, 2014
Defendant’s Response Brief Due: June 25, 2014
Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: July 10, 2014
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.
Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B.
Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.
10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A.
( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
B.
( X ) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS
OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.
-3-
DATED this 16th day of April, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
s/ Nicholas Purifoy
By: s/ Alexess D. Rea
Nicholas D. Purifoy (MO #57816)
Alexess D. Rea
Disability Professionals
214 W. 18th St., Suite 100
Kansas City, MO 64108
(816) 221-8800
(816) 221-0078 (facsimile)
npurifoy@mydisabilityprofessionals.com
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
1961 Stout St., Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294-4003
(303) 844-7101
(303) 844-0770 (facsimile)
alexess.rea@ssa.gov
Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorneys for Defendant
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?