Valdez, et al v. Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) et al

Filing 56

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 7/22/14. Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Plaintiffs' Responses to Defendant's [sic] First Set of Written Discovery Requests [#53] is DENIED as moot. Plaintiffs' Motion for Ex tension of Time to Serve Plaintiffs' Responses to Defendant's [sic] First Set of Written Discovery Requests [#54] is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall respond to Defendants' First Set of Written Discovery Requests on or before August 11, 2014. (lgale)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-03417-REB-KLM ANTONIA H. VALDEZ, as an individual and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Andres A. Valdez, ABRAHAM BANEGAS, BRIAN COREY, BRANDON RAND, KIT COOK, MARIO GONZALES, and Plaintiffs, v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, SERGEANT RONALD BOWERS, in his individual and official capacities, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GRACE CORTEZ, in her individual and official capacities, by and through her estate, and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SCOTT WEICKUM, in his individual and official capacities, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER ______________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Plaintiffs’ Responses to Defendant’s [sic] First Set of Written Discovery Requests [#53]1 (the “First Motion”) and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Plaintiffs’ Responses to Defendant’s [sic] First Set of Written Discovery Requests [#54] (the “Second Motion”). Both Motions request the same relief, however, the Second Motion reflects the signature of counsel for all Plaintiffs. Accordingly, the First Motion is moot. Further, D.C.COLO.LCivR 6.1(a) provides for the relief requested, permitting extension of Plaintiffs’ obligation to respond to “interrogatories, requests for production of documents, or requests for admissions” of up to 21 days, upon the filing of an appropriate stipulation. The Second Motion, which is unopposed, is accepted in lieu of the required stipulation. 1 “[#54]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this Minute Order. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the First Motion [#53] is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Second Motion [#54] is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall respond to Defendants’ First Set of Written Discovery Requests on or before August 11, 2014. Dated: July 22, 2014 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?