Porter v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company

Filing 147

MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Judge Wiley Y. Daniel: Jury Trial (Day 3) held on 2/10/2016. Granting in part and denying in part as outlined by the Court on the record 80 Motion in Limine. Court Reporter: Mary George. (rkeec)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO SENIOR JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL Courtroom Deputy: E.C.R./Reporter: Robert R. Keech Mary George Date: February 10, 2016 Civil Action No: 13-cv-03446-WYD-KMT Counsel: DANIEL L. PORTER, Sander N. Karp James F. Fosnaught Gregory S. Russi Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Debra K. Sutton Ashley R. Larson Defendant. COURTROOM MINUTES TRIAL TO JURY (DAY 3) 9:21 a.m. Court in Session - Jury not present Discussion regarding the fact that counsel has resolved objections in the Martha Haraway and Greg Feinsinger depositions. 9:22 a.m. Discussion regarding testimony of Richard Laugesen. 9:27 a.m. Jury enters 9:28 a.m. Plaintiff’s witness Martha Haraway continues by video deposition. 10:02 a.m. Plaintiff’s witness Greg Feinsinger by video deposition. 11:01 a.m. Court in Recess -1- 11:19 a.m. Court in Session - Jury not present. ORDERED: Defendant’s Trial Brief Regarding the Admissibility of the Underinsured Motorist Policy Limits [ECF Doc. No. 141], filed February 8, 2016, is GRANTED. ORDERED: Witnesses shall not refer to policy limits during their testimony. 11:22 a.m. Discussion regarding scheduling issues. 11:26 a.m. Jury enters 11:26 a.m. Plaintiff’s witness James Evenson sworn. Direct examination by Plaintiff (Mr. Karp). EX ID: 43, 44, 45, 46 Exhibit(s) 43, 44, 45, 46 RECEIVED. Witness tendered and accepted as an expert. 12:04 p.m. Cross examination by Defendant (Ms. Sutton). EX ID: 43, 44, 45, 46 12:25 p.m. Re-Direct examination by Plaintiff (Mr. Karp). 12:27 p.m. Discussion regarding schedule for this afternoon. 12:28 p.m. Court in Recess 12:33 p.m. Court in Session - Jury not present 12:34 p.m. Plaintiff’s witness Richard W. Laugesen sworn. Direct examination by Plaintiff (Mr. Fosnaught). Witness tendered and accepted as an expert. 1:07 p.m. Cross examination by Defendant (Ms. Sutton). 1:16 p.m. Argument by Defendant (Ms. Sutton). 1:20 p.m. Discussion regarding policy limits. -2- ORDERED: Defendant’s Motion to Limit or Exclude Testimony of Plaintiff’s Insurance Bad Faith Expert, Richard Laugesen [ECF Doc. No. 80], filed August 11, 2015, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as outlined by the Court on the record. 1:21 p.m. Court in Recess 2:22 p.m. Court in Session - Jury enters 2:24 p.m. Plaintiff’s witness Richard W. Laugesen sworn. Direct examination by Plaintiff (Mr. Fosnaught). EX ID: 41 Witness tendered and accepted as an expert. 3:23 p.m. Cross examination by Defendant (Ms. Sutton). EX ID: 41, 64, A-3, A-4, A-34 Exhibit(s) 64, A-3, A-4 RECEIVED. 3:55 p.m. Re-Direct examination by Plaintiff (Mr. Fosnaught). EX ID: 41 3:59 p.m. Re-Cross examination by Defendant (Ms. Sutton). 4:02 p.m. Court in Recess 4:19 p.m. Court in Session - Jury not present Court’s remarks regarding jury instructions and jury instruction conference. 4:21 p.m. Discussion regarding issue related to denial of the claim. 4:26 p.m. Jury enters 4:26 p.m. Plaintiff’s witness Margie Lucille Porter sworn. Direct examination by Plaintiff (Mr. Fosnaught). 4:43 p.m. Jury excused Discussion regarding objection by Defendant - SUSTAINED. -3- 4:49 p.m. Jury enters Direct examination by Plaintiff continues (Mr. Fosnaught). 4:59 p.m. Cross examination by Defendant (Ms. Sutton). EX ID: A-26, A-27, A-28, A-29, A-30 Exhibit(s) A-26, A-27, A-28, A-29, A-30 RECEIVED. 5:19 p.m. Re-Direct examination by Plaintiff (Mr. Fosnaught). 5:22 p.m. Plaintiff rests. Discussion regarding schedule for tomorrow. 5:24 p.m. Jury excused for the evening. Discussion regarding issues as to testimony of Gregory Giometti and Kyle Jacobson. 5:27 p.m. Court in Recess - TRIAL CONTINUED. TOTAL TIME: 6:25 -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?