Naeve v. Colvin

Filing 12

ORDER- JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 4/8/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 5/8/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 5/22/2014. By Judge John L. Kane on 3/14/2014. (trlee, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-03459-AP
Barbara Naeve
Plaintiff,
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

-1-

1.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Timothy Quinn
3515 S. Tamarac Dr., #200
Denver CO 80237
303-757-5000
[e-mail]
For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
J. Benedict García
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
[e-mail]

Alexess D. Rea
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1961 Stout, Suite 4169
Denver, Colorado 80294-4003
303-844-7101
303-844-0770 (facsimile)
[e-mail]
2.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3.

DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.

Date Complaint Was Filed: 12/23/13

B.

Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 12/27/13

C.

Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 2/24/14

-2-

4.

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
The administrative record is complete.

5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Neither party contemplates additional evidence.

6.

STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES
Neither party contemplates unusual claims or defenses.

7.

OTHER MATTERS
No other matters at this time.

8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.
B.

Defendant’s Response Brief Due: May 8, 2014

C.
9.

Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: April 8, 2014

Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: May 22, 2014

STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.

Plaintiff’s Statement.

Plaintiff requests oral argument for the following reasons: The extensive record of medical
evaluation and treatment interacting with SSA regulations and procedures deserves argument.
B.

Defendant's Statement:

Defendant states that oral argument is not necessary.
10.

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A.

(

B.

(x)

)

All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.

-3-

11.

AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS
OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.
DATED this 14th day of March, 2014.
BY THE COURT:

s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVED:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
s/ Timothy Quinn
Timothy Quinn
3515 S. Tamarac Dr., #200
Denver, CO 80237
Telephone:
303-757-5000
e-mail address: [e-mail]

By: s/ Alexess D. Rea
Alexess D. Rea
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
1961 Stout St., Suite 4169
Denver CO 80294-4003
Telephone: [phone]
e-mail address: [e-mail]

Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorneys for Defendant

-4-