Bristol v. El Paso County Sheriff Dep. et al
Filing
62
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 3/23/15 re: 60 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 36) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8, 12(b)(1) and 12(b) (6). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on or before April 13, 2015, Plaintiff shall file a Response to the Motion. (lgale, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00012-RM-KLM
TOMMY WAYNE BRISTOL,
Plaintiff,
v.
EL PASO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.,
C. MOTT, Deputy, and
N. NUNCIO, Deputy,
DORSEY, Deputy,
HOLLOWAY, Deputy,
HARE, Deputy,
ELMANTE, Deputy,
JEFFERSON, Deputy,
SORY, Deputy,
GOODLOW, Deputy,
SIRDIS, Deputy,
JOHNSON, Specialist,
SEETER, Deputy, and
HABERT, Sergeant, in his individual capacity,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s
Amended Complaint (Doc. 36) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8, 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) [#60]
(the “Motion”). The Motion was filed on January 15, 2015. Plaintiff, who proceeds in this
matter as a pro se litigant, has neither filed a Response to the Motion nor requested an
extension of time in which to do so.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on or before April 13, 2015, Plaintiff shall file a
Response to the Motion. Failure to comply with this order may result in Plaintiff’s
case being dismissed for failure to prosecute.
Dated: March 23, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?