Ghailani v. Holder et al

Filing 59

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/3/14 re: Motion to Intervene as Plaintiffs with Newly Discovered Evidence Under Rule 24(A)? Rule 24(B) 34 , Motion to Intervene 44 , Motion to Intervene 45 , and Motion to Intervene 56 . IT IS ORDERED that the Motions are DENIED AS MOOT. (bsimm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 14-cv-00041-CMA-BNB AHMED KHALFAN GHAILANI, Plaintiff, v. ERIC HOLDER, US ATTORNEY GENERAL, US ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, SDNY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT OPERATIONS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, and DAVID BERKEBILE, ADX Warden, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on the following (the “Motions”): (1) Motion to Intervene as Plaintiffs with Newly Discovered Evidence Under Rule 24(A)? Rule 24(B) [Doc. #34, filed 07/10/2014]; (2) Motion to Intervene [Doc. #44, filed 08/13/2014]; (3) Motion to Intervene [Doc. #45, filed 08/22/2014]; and (4) Motion to Intervene [Doc. #56, filed 10/14/2014]. The Motions are filed by individuals seeking to intervene in this action. Separately, I have recommended that the action be dismissed. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Dated November 3, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?