Wittmer v. E.I Dupont
Filing
40
Final Judgment. ORDERED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of defendant DuPont and against plaintiff Nicole Wittmer. It is further ORDERED that defendant is AWARDED its costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. It is further ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety. Entered by Clerk on 12/29/14. (jhawk, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00091-PAB-BNB
NICOLE WITTMER,
Plaintiff,
v.
DuPONT,
Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the Order [Docket No. 39] of United States District Judge Philip A.
Brimmer entered on December 23, 2014, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Docket
No. 36] is ACCEPTED. It is further
ORDERED that defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Wittmer’s First Amended
Complaint [Docket No. 16] is GRANTED. It is further
ORDERED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of defendant DuPont and
against plaintiff Nicole Wittmer. It is further
ORDERED that defendant is AWARDED its costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of
the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. It is further
ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety.
Dated at Denver, Colorado this 29th day of December, 2014.
FOR THE COURT:
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK
By: s/
Jennifer Hawkins
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?